topic Re: How to tell CheckOut to keep changes on :working member in a sandbox? in Systems/Software Engineering

How to tell CheckOut to keep changes on :working member in a sandbox?

mnein — Mon, 15 Feb 2016 09:41:15 GMT

Hi,have some trouble using PTC Integrity ... hope it´s due to my beginner status Usecase:(0) setup a sandbox(1) have a binary file member(2) make working file writable(3) apply some changes in the sandbox (to the working file)(4) do a CheckOut to bring the changes under source control(5)

Re: How to tell CheckOut to keep changes on :working member in a sandbox?

tdalon — Mon, 15 Feb 2016 12:38:55 GMT

Hi Markus, instead of doing a Check-out you could simply lock the head revision and then check-in.

Re: How to tell CheckOut to keep changes on :working member in a sandbox?

amatei — Wed, 17 Feb 2016 07:39:29 GMT

Hi,

I have tested your scenario with a binary PNG file .

When I check out the file I get a warning message box. Please see the attached screen captures.

Please verify your Check Out operation preferences

Follow from the menu File->Preferences->Configuration Management - > Commands -> Check Out

On my computer I have

- an "On conflicts" dropdown list which is set to "Confirm" .

- a checkbox with a question mark "[?] Overwrite working file if changed"

For this reason when I actually perform the Check Out operation I can see in the "Options>>" section.

the "[?] Overwrite working file if changed" checkbox set with a question mark

I assume this is why the PTC Integrity Client asks before overwriting my image.

Re: How to tell CheckOut to keep changes on :working member in a sandbox?

mnein — Wed, 17 Feb 2016 10:24:01 GMT

Hi Alexandru,

I´ve already consulted these settings ... w/o success.

I observe different behavior for ASCII and binary files.

On ASCII files,

all these settings work as I expect -- I can "checkout" the member and have the LOCK applied to it, local changes in the sandbox not discarded.

Only the "[?] Overwrite working file if changed" does not open the dialog ... simply does the same as "[ ] Overwrite working file if changed".

On binary files,

the checkout refuses to apply the LOCK to the member whenever I try to keep the local changes in the sandbox (the working file is modified).

Thus I can not use the checkout command when I have already modified the binary file.

Is it a bug or a feature that binary files are treated different compared to ASCII files?

What is the intention of the setting:

Revision to checkout --> Pre-Defined-Revision: Working

I thought this would mean that I "checkout" the current working file, thus keeping potential local changes and apply the LOCK.

But it looks like this setting does the same as when selection "Member".

But we are lucky, there is the "workaround" with the "Lock Member" command as suggested by Thierry which works fine so far.

Still need to figure out on which version the LOCK is applied ... but I hope/guess it will be the correct one

Thanx

Markus

Re: How to tell CheckOut to keep changes on :working member in a sandbox?

amatei — Wed, 17 Feb 2016 11:04:21 GMT

Hi Markus

>Only the "[?] Overwrite working file if changed" does not open the dialog ... simply does the same as "[ ] Overwrite working file if changed

Isn't that strange as well ?

>Revision to checkout --> Pre-Defined-Revision: Working

On my computer when I actually perform the Check Out operation, I have

Revision to checkout --> (*) Pre-Defined-Revision: Member option selected in the dropdown list

Re: How to tell CheckOut to keep changes on :working member in a sandbox?

tdalon — Wed, 17 Feb 2016 11:18:42 GMT

Hi Markus

you can control which version you want to lock from the Member History View/Tree (Alt+Enter).

You may want to check-out with no lock before to get for example the head revision as your working revision (si co --gui --nolock).

Re: How to tell CheckOut to keep changes on :working member in a sandbox?

tdalon — Wed, 17 Feb 2016 11:19:40 GMT

Hi Alexandru,

Regarding 2.

it may be because in your example file the working revision is the same as the member revision?

Re: How to tell CheckOut to keep changes on :working member in a sandbox?

mnein — Thu, 18 Feb 2016 07:41:53 GMT

Hi Alexandru,

the defaults on my setup are the same as yours, but I played around a bit to figure out if these setting have some effect.

...

Isn't that strange as well ?

Yes!

My current conclusion is to avoid using checkout, instead using the "lock members" command. Until I experience some trouble.

Why: my current project is about c, python, LabView and some office docs .... involving lots of binary files where I do not want to lose my local changes ....