<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Neumann Boundary Conditions in Mathcad</title>
    <link>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/Mathcad/Neumann-Boundary-Conditions/m-p/377221#M148027</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Try this. I did it in MC 15 so I could read your model easily but it should work the same in Prime.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2014 01:02:52 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>HarveyHensley</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-05-16T01:02:52Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Neumann Boundary Conditions</title>
      <link>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/Mathcad/Neumann-Boundary-Conditions/m-p/377218#M148024</link>
      <description>Hello folks,I'm trying to learn how to specify Neumann boundary conditions using numol to solve a PDE.As you may be aware, Prime 3.0 does not feature Pdesolve so if we want to solve a PDE, we need to use either numol, relax or multigrid.I'm using a rather simple example of</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2018 16:15:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/Mathcad/Neumann-Boundary-Conditions/m-p/377218#M148024</guid>
      <dc:creator>jadornonunez</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-05-03T16:15:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Neumann Boundary Conditions</title>
      <link>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/Mathcad/Neumann-Boundary-Conditions/m-p/377219#M148025</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I looked at your pdesolve example and your second boundary condition is called "mixed", not Neumann, because it involves both the dependent variable and its derivative. Numol does not accept mixed boundary conditions. That is why we need pdesolve back in Prime, but hopefully in a vector/matrix form.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2014 23:28:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/Mathcad/Neumann-Boundary-Conditions/m-p/377219#M148025</guid>
      <dc:creator>HarveyHensley</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-05-15T23:28:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Neumann Boundary Conditions</title>
      <link>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/Mathcad/Neumann-Boundary-Conditions/m-p/377220#M148026</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks Harvey for your reply.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now, if we change the second boundary condition to a true Neumann BC, say, a heat flux of 5. How do we set up the boundary conditions?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The example that is included in the Mathcad 15 help is, in my opinion, confusing, at least in terms of the boundary conditions.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you again.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2014 23:51:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/Mathcad/Neumann-Boundary-Conditions/m-p/377220#M148026</guid>
      <dc:creator>jadornonunez</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-05-15T23:51:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Neumann Boundary Conditions</title>
      <link>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/Mathcad/Neumann-Boundary-Conditions/m-p/377221#M148027</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Try this. I did it in MC 15 so I could read your model easily but it should work the same in Prime.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2014 01:02:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/Mathcad/Neumann-Boundary-Conditions/m-p/377221#M148027</guid>
      <dc:creator>HarveyHensley</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-05-16T01:02:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Neumann Boundary Conditions</title>
      <link>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/Mathcad/Neumann-Boundary-Conditions/m-p/377222#M148028</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think I had the init argument wrong, so an updated file is attached. It doesn't change the results because the init values are not a function of x.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2014 01:20:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/Mathcad/Neumann-Boundary-Conditions/m-p/377222#M148028</guid>
      <dc:creator>HarveyHensley</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-05-16T01:20:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Neumann Boundary Conditions</title>
      <link>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/Mathcad/Neumann-Boundary-Conditions/m-p/377223#M148029</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Oops. The x and t arguments were still incorrect in places. But because of your problem, nothing changed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2014 01:33:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/Mathcad/Neumann-Boundary-Conditions/m-p/377223#M148029</guid>
      <dc:creator>HarveyHensley</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-05-16T01:33:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Neumann Boundary Conditions</title>
      <link>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/Mathcad/Neumann-Boundary-Conditions/m-p/377224#M148030</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Harvey, thanks a lot!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, I noticed the minor issue with the argument of bc_func, but that much I knew how to figure out. As you mentioned, the result is unaltered as the slab is initially at a constant temperature.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Pdesolve is DEFINITELY needed in Prime as numol is not quite as versatile as pdesolve (not that pdesolve is perfect, but considering...).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Anyway, thanks again. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Josué&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2014 01:38:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/Mathcad/Neumann-Boundary-Conditions/m-p/377224#M148030</guid>
      <dc:creator>jadornonunez</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-05-16T01:38:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

