<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Better Fit in Mathcad</title>
    <link>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/Mathcad/Better-Fit/m-p/545943#M179841</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I guess a polynomial of 9th degree is too wavy, too?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Its interesting that we can even demand for a higher order polynomial:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/6898i973B5F210E82756B/image-size/original?v=1.0&amp;amp;px=-1" border="0" alt="B1.png" title="B1.png" width="490" height="300" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/6899i87A9DD0564574057/image-size/original?v=1.0&amp;amp;px=-1" border="0" alt="B2.png" title="B2.png" width="487" height="302" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2018 19:41:06 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Werner_E</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-04-21T19:41:06Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Better Fit</title>
      <link>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/Mathcad/Better-Fit/m-p/545926#M179838</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi to all,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In the attached (MCP3) file, can anyone give me some suggestions on how to get a better plot of f(x)? I have tried varying splines but the plot is quite erratic toward the end where as I would expect it to be quite uniform.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Andy&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2018 13:13:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/Mathcad/Better-Fit/m-p/545926#M179838</guid>
      <dc:creator>awibroe</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-05-03T13:13:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Better Fit</title>
      <link>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/Mathcad/Better-Fit/m-p/545929#M179839</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Here's a Schumaker quadratic spline.&amp;nbsp; Bit of a kink at 80, but it's closer than what you had.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/6895iA099B7209FA4E523/image-size/original?v=1.0&amp;amp;px=-1" border="0" alt="2018-04-21_9-07-56.jpg" title="2018-04-21_9-07-56.jpg" /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/6896iC54BC83AF339494D/image-size/original?v=1.0&amp;amp;px=-1" border="0" alt="2018-04-21_9-08-59.jpg" title="2018-04-21_9-08-59.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I fit the quadratic and then fit that with a b-spline so you can use it easily.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;4.0 and pdf attached.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Also, linear interpolation might be good enough for your data, but there's not much fun in that.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2018 14:16:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/Mathcad/Better-Fit/m-p/545929#M179839</guid>
      <dc:creator>DJF</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-04-21T14:16:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Better Fit</title>
      <link>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/Mathcad/Better-Fit/m-p/545943#M179841</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I guess a polynomial of 9th degree is too wavy, too?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Its interesting that we can even demand for a higher order polynomial:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/6898i973B5F210E82756B/image-size/original?v=1.0&amp;amp;px=-1" border="0" alt="B1.png" title="B1.png" width="490" height="300" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/6899i87A9DD0564574057/image-size/original?v=1.0&amp;amp;px=-1" border="0" alt="B2.png" title="B2.png" width="487" height="302" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2018 19:41:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/Mathcad/Better-Fit/m-p/545943#M179841</guid>
      <dc:creator>Werner_E</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-04-21T19:41:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Better Fit</title>
      <link>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/Mathcad/Better-Fit/m-p/545950#M179844</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Is this the measured filter characteristic&amp;nbsp; (X in Hz, Y in dB) of an elliptic low-pass filter? &lt;A href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elliptic_filter" target="_blank"&gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elliptic_filter&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Or a Tshebyshev low-pass filter? &lt;A href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chebyshev_filter" target="_blank"&gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chebyshev_filter&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Then you should be able to find a better fitting with the corresponding filter formulae.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It would also seem then, that you did not measure enough points to accurately catch the passband ripple: considering the very steep roll-off after about 80 Hz I'd expect many more ripples in the passband.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Like this:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/6900iBEF83D8BAB73A198/image-size/original?v=1.0&amp;amp;px=-1" border="0" alt="LM_20180422_Chebyshev.png" title="LM_20180422_Chebyshev.png" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Success!&lt;BR /&gt;Luc&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2018 11:07:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/Mathcad/Better-Fit/m-p/545950#M179844</guid>
      <dc:creator>LucMeekes</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-04-22T11:07:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Better Fit</title>
      <link>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/Mathcad/Better-Fit/m-p/546248#M179890</link>
      <description>Hi, no this is points on a stability curve that I’ve created in MC for a ship. I extracted the points to a fresh sheet to make this easier. Yes I guess I could have simulated more points...&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Cheers&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Andy</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2018 17:38:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/Mathcad/Better-Fit/m-p/546248#M179890</guid>
      <dc:creator>awibroe</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-04-24T17:38:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

