<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Partial derivative evaluation in Mathcad</title>
    <link>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/Mathcad/Partial-derivative-evaluation/m-p/838345#M203729</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks a lot, Luc!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2022 22:46:46 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Sergey</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-11-15T22:46:46Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Partial derivative evaluation</title>
      <link>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/Mathcad/Partial-derivative-evaluation/m-p/838284#M203722</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Would you, please, point out why I can't evaluate the symbolic expression of of the r(x,0) function while d(0) is possible to evaluate? Those are identical expressions but by some reason Mathcad evaluates correctly only one of them. It is inconvinient to introduce new function such as d(t) to compute r(x,t). I marked equations by the blue colour.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sergey&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2022 20:27:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/Mathcad/Partial-derivative-evaluation/m-p/838284#M203722</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sergey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-11-15T20:27:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Partial derivative evaluation</title>
      <link>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/Mathcad/Partial-derivative-evaluation/m-p/838311#M203725</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You have a function r defined as:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="LucMeekes_1-1668545266829.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/70932i4C41A4F076817892/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="LucMeekes_1-1668545266829.png" alt="LucMeekes_1-1668545266829.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;and define a function d with:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="LucMeekes_2-1668545421983.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/70937iA64F1767CD251354/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="LucMeekes_2-1668545421983.png" alt="LucMeekes_2-1668545421983.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;and wonder why:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="LucMeekes_0-1668545190689.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/70931iD343D790F6389475/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="LucMeekes_0-1668545190689.png" alt="LucMeekes_0-1668545190689.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;That is because Prime doesn't look back to the definition of r, to check and see if it was defined with a parameter t or not. It sees that r(x,0) is NOT a function of t, so the result of the (partial) derivative is 0.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Note that:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="LucMeekes_3-1668545444548.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/70939i80464E77F4A57AEA/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="LucMeekes_3-1668545444548.png" alt="LucMeekes_3-1668545444548.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;(I replaced t with z...) which means that fun is essentially the same function as your function d.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In order to get:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="LucMeekes_4-1668545506567.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/70942iB15380490C6E4A26/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="LucMeekes_4-1668545506567.png" alt="LucMeekes_4-1668545506567.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;be the same as the direct form through the partial derivative, you have to:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="LucMeekes_5-1668545550836.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/70944i06CDEA5077052CE8/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="LucMeekes_5-1668545550836.png" alt="LucMeekes_5-1668545550836.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Success!&lt;BR /&gt;Luc&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2022 20:54:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/Mathcad/Partial-derivative-evaluation/m-p/838311#M203725</guid>
      <dc:creator>LucMeekes</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-11-15T20:54:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Partial derivative evaluation</title>
      <link>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/Mathcad/Partial-derivative-evaluation/m-p/838345#M203729</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks a lot, Luc!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2022 22:46:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/Mathcad/Partial-derivative-evaluation/m-p/838345#M203729</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sergey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-11-15T22:46:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

