<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Has anyone ever successfully generated an IP1752 from the BOM report feature? in Windchill</title>
    <link>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/Windchill/Has-anyone-ever-successfully-generated-an-IP1752-from-the-BOM/m-p/8822#M53589</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;It would be a great feature to have it it was successful, and we didn't have to deal with time consuming work arounds.&amp;nbsp; Even after we set applicability to parts that don't have compliance, the report is missing data, and the XML doesn't import into a builder.&amp;nbsp; If anyone has had luck, please share your secret.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If no one has luck, is there interest to have this report work?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2018 17:05:40 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>stoland</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-01-11T17:05:40Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Has anyone ever successfully generated an IP1752 from the BOM report feature?</title>
      <link>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/Windchill/Has-anyone-ever-successfully-generated-an-IP1752-from-the-BOM/m-p/8822#M53589</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It would be a great feature to have it it was successful, and we didn't have to deal with time consuming work arounds.&amp;nbsp; Even after we set applicability to parts that don't have compliance, the report is missing data, and the XML doesn't import into a builder.&amp;nbsp; If anyone has had luck, please share your secret.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If no one has luck, is there interest to have this report work?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2018 17:05:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/Windchill/Has-anyone-ever-successfully-generated-an-IP1752-from-the-BOM/m-p/8822#M53589</guid>
      <dc:creator>stoland</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-01-11T17:05:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Has anyone ever successfully generated an IP1752 from the BOM report feature?</title>
      <link>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/Windchill/Has-anyone-ever-successfully-generated-an-IP1752-from-the-BOM/m-p/481878#M53590</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If you have searched a BOM, and clicked its Company Part, select in the Actions menu Generate IPC-1752 Report then Go.&amp;nbsp; After a couple of prompt screens the xml is fully generated.&amp;nbsp; This assumes your supplier data is Full Disclosure for all the parts in the BOM, at least if you desire a Class D.&amp;nbsp; Otherwise I don't understand your problem.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2017 19:05:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/Windchill/Has-anyone-ever-successfully-generated-an-IP1752-from-the-BOM/m-p/481878#M53590</guid>
      <dc:creator>rfranz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-08-17T19:05:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

