<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: WTPart and EPM Document in diffent Workflows in Windchill</title>
    <link>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/Windchill/WTPart-and-EPM-Document-in-diffent-Workflows/m-p/943296#M79637</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If your intention is to continue to use the common WF template, then in this case you need to introduce an expression robot after the set state robot&amp;nbsp; (the state where you want to fork the work flow).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In that expression robot you need to give the branching based on the Primary Business Object type.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;After the two forks are made , make sure to return to the common flow again.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope you get the point.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hari&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2024 10:56:55 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Hari_Vara</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-04-12T10:56:55Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>WTPart and EPM Document in diffent Workflows</title>
      <link>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/Windchill/WTPart-and-EPM-Document-in-diffent-Workflows/m-p/943272#M79632</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Our WTParts and EPM Documents are normally in the same Workflow.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I want to change it for one Lifecyclestep. Where can i change it?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2024 08:33:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/Windchill/WTPart-and-EPM-Document-in-diffent-Workflows/m-p/943272#M79632</guid>
      <dc:creator>uvex_windchill</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-04-12T08:33:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: WTPart and EPM Document in diffent Workflows</title>
      <link>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/Windchill/WTPart-and-EPM-Document-in-diffent-Workflows/m-p/943296#M79637</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If your intention is to continue to use the common WF template, then in this case you need to introduce an expression robot after the set state robot&amp;nbsp; (the state where you want to fork the work flow).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In that expression robot you need to give the branching based on the Primary Business Object type.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;After the two forks are made , make sure to return to the common flow again.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope you get the point.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hari&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2024 10:56:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/Windchill/WTPart-and-EPM-Document-in-diffent-Workflows/m-p/943296#M79637</guid>
      <dc:creator>Hari_Vara</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-04-12T10:56:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: WTPart and EPM Document in diffent Workflows</title>
      <link>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/Windchill/WTPart-and-EPM-Document-in-diffent-Workflows/m-p/943309#M79639</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;this means i have to change the workflow?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i already have the two worksflow which i dont want to change. one should raise the WTParts and the other should raise the EPM Documents from same lifecylce state to same lifecycle state&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2024 11:58:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/Windchill/WTPart-and-EPM-Document-in-diffent-Workflows/m-p/943309#M79639</guid>
      <dc:creator>uvex_windchill</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-04-12T11:58:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: WTPart and EPM Document in diffent Workflows</title>
      <link>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/Windchill/WTPart-and-EPM-Document-in-diffent-Workflows/m-p/943325#M79642</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I was thinking that you wanted to continue to use the same WF template.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now that you dont want to constraint with that , then the most flexible approach would be to define separate LC templates, one for CAD and other for Part. I have not come across a capability where within the same LC&amp;nbsp; template its possible to define different Workflows for different types., this being not there, the only solution seems to use 2 different LC templates.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Once done that you can have seperate WFs for CAD and Part ( eventhough the before and after LC states are same).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope its clear now.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hari&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2024 12:34:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/Windchill/WTPart-and-EPM-Document-in-diffent-Workflows/m-p/943325#M79642</guid>
      <dc:creator>Hari_Vara</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-04-12T12:34:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

