<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Shell Idealization Over the Solid Model in Geometric Element Analysis in Analysis</title>
    <link>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/Analysis/Shell-Idealization-Over-the-Solid-Model-in-Geometric-Element/m-p/446843#M1379</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi, &lt;A href="https://community.ptc.com/u1/337038"&gt;Paul Kloninger&lt;/A&gt;‌&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; Nice Job, We can add the contact &amp;amp; large deformation to Limitations of shell model. also, u have used the symmetry feature from Simulate that too have some more advantages than using full model.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you for your valuable Job.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2017 13:33:30 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>PARTHIBAN_K</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-03-17T13:33:30Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Shell Idealization Over the Solid Model in Geometric Element Analysis</title>
      <link>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/Analysis/Shell-Idealization-Over-the-Solid-Model-in-Geometric-Element/m-p/446841#M1377</link>
      <description>Shell Idealization Over the Solid Model in Geometric Element AnalysisBY PARTHIBAN KANNAN · PUBLISHED MARCH 15, 2017 · UPDATED MARCH 17, 2017Hello Guys,Here, I am going to explain about the advantages of shell idealization over the solid model. I have done Geometric Element Analysis</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2018 12:07:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/Analysis/Shell-Idealization-Over-the-Solid-Model-in-Geometric-Element/m-p/446841#M1377</guid>
      <dc:creator>PARTHIBAN_K</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-05-03T12:07:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Shell Idealization Over the Solid Model in Geometric Element Analysis</title>
      <link>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/Analysis/Shell-Idealization-Over-the-Solid-Model-in-Geometric-Element/m-p/446842#M1378</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Shell model...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Contact???&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Large Deformation???&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;not possible&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;support / example&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG alt="example.jpg" class="jive-image image-1" src="https://community.ptc.com/legacyfs/online/113276_example.jpg" style="height: 438px; width: 620px; float: left;" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2017 11:58:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/Analysis/Shell-Idealization-Over-the-Solid-Model-in-Geometric-Element/m-p/446842#M1378</guid>
      <dc:creator>skunks</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-17T11:58:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Shell Idealization Over the Solid Model in Geometric Element Analysis</title>
      <link>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/Analysis/Shell-Idealization-Over-the-Solid-Model-in-Geometric-Element/m-p/446843#M1379</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi, &lt;A href="https://community.ptc.com/u1/337038"&gt;Paul Kloninger&lt;/A&gt;‌&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; Nice Job, We can add the contact &amp;amp; large deformation to Limitations of shell model. also, u have used the symmetry feature from Simulate that too have some more advantages than using full model.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you for your valuable Job.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2017 13:33:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/Analysis/Shell-Idealization-Over-the-Solid-Model-in-Geometric-Element/m-p/446843#M1379</guid>
      <dc:creator>PARTHIBAN_K</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-17T13:33:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Shell Idealization Over the Solid Model in Geometric Element Analysis</title>
      <link>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/Analysis/Shell-Idealization-Over-the-Solid-Model-in-Geometric-Element/m-p/446844#M1380</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi, in the drawing is missing some measures like inner and outer radius.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm trying to redo the exercise with solid non-tetra elements.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2017 09:23:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/Analysis/Shell-Idealization-Over-the-Solid-Model-in-Geometric-Element/m-p/446844#M1380</guid>
      <dc:creator>gfraulini</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-30T09:23:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Shell Idealization Over the Solid Model in Geometric Element Analysis</title>
      <link>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/Analysis/Shell-Idealization-Over-the-Solid-Model-in-Geometric-Element/m-p/549374#M1381</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;What about in modal analysis? Are the natural frequencies within 5% as your static deflection results?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Rich Hilson&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2018 19:45:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/Analysis/Shell-Idealization-Over-the-Solid-Model-in-Geometric-Element/m-p/549374#M1381</guid>
      <dc:creator>rhilson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-05-17T19:45:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Shell Idealization Over the Solid Model in Geometric Element Analysis</title>
      <link>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/Analysis/Shell-Idealization-Over-the-Solid-Model-in-Geometric-Element/m-p/580453#M1382</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;A short test for Modal Analyses with only solid versus Solid AND shell in Creo 5.0.2.0. Strangly calculation time is MUCH MORE with shells than with only Solid in this case (49min. vs 1min). Mesh settings are default and only&amp;nbsp;Quickstudy is applied, so I wouldn't worry over the result difference. I'm not ready to jump into conclusions yet, but at least be alert using shells in Modal.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="C5_solid_vs_shell_modal.jpg" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/11969i96F5CFF59C0FCE35/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="C5_solid_vs_shell_modal.jpg" alt="C5_solid_vs_shell_modal.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2018 12:34:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/Analysis/Shell-Idealization-Over-the-Solid-Model-in-Geometric-Element/m-p/580453#M1382</guid>
      <dc:creator>auijttewaal</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-11-09T12:34:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Shell Idealization Over the Solid Model in Geometric Element Analysis</title>
      <link>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/Analysis/Shell-Idealization-Over-the-Solid-Model-in-Geometric-Element/m-p/581457#M1383</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We found Modal Analyses (in this example) is only slow when using Shell Pairs, not with 'simple' shells (defined by a single surface).&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2018 09:53:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/Analysis/Shell-Idealization-Over-the-Solid-Model-in-Geometric-Element/m-p/581457#M1383</guid>
      <dc:creator>auijttewaal</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-11-16T09:53:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

