<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Trimming Solids and Part Modeling Question in Analysis</title>
    <link>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/Analysis/Trimming-Solids-and-Part-Modeling-Question/m-p/378129#M4095</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'd say more than acceptable - it's the default approach.&amp;nbsp; They're not really separate solids, just separate (solid) features.&amp;nbsp; As soon as you add each new one it just becomes part of the part (if that makes sense!).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm not familiar with NX, but in Creo it's generally considered good practice to build up your part using many, simple features, rather than trying to cram all the detail into a single feature.&amp;nbsp; Therefore building up your solid incrementally this way is absolutely fine.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2016 08:39:35 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>JonathanHodgson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-02-17T08:39:35Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Trimming Solids and Part Modeling Question</title>
      <link>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/Analysis/Trimming-Solids-and-Part-Modeling-Question/m-p/378126#M4092</link>
      <description>NX user here learning Creo 2.0.&amp;nbsp; I'm modeling a part with several revolved surfaces which overlap.&amp;nbsp; Shown below, the gray is reference "independent geometry.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Three revolved sketches form three solids as shown. Is there a way to combine the separate revolved models into one.&amp;nbsp;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2020 15:21:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/Analysis/Trimming-Solids-and-Part-Modeling-Question/m-p/378126#M4092</guid>
      <dc:creator>mwesselski</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-12-13T15:21:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Trimming Solids and Part Modeling Question</title>
      <link>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/Analysis/Trimming-Solids-and-Part-Modeling-Question/m-p/378127#M4093</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Mark,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I can see two basic approaches to this in Creo.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The first is to just revolve each feature as a solid, in which case they will all merge into the part anyway - job done.&amp;nbsp; Creo is based on a philosophy of 'one part, one solid' as an analogue of real life - anything with more than one part is an assembly of, well, more than one part.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The second approach is to model each revolve as a surface, and with complex models this can be a very robust approach.&amp;nbsp; You can either make each surface (or 'quilt') closed, and solidify each one independently and they will merge together as above (no trimming required); or you can Merge each quilt into the previous one, then solidify the resulting quilt (this is the basis of the robustness I mentioned).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2016 16:56:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/Analysis/Trimming-Solids-and-Part-Modeling-Question/m-p/378127#M4093</guid>
      <dc:creator>JonathanHodgson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-02-16T16:56:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Trimming Solids and Part Modeling Question</title>
      <link>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/Analysis/Trimming-Solids-and-Part-Modeling-Question/m-p/378128#M4094</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hmmm? So, its acceptable to have separate solids which make up one part?&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; As an experiment and to my surprise, I was able to create a "round" fillet feature with two of the solids in my file.&amp;nbsp; In NX of course, it is treated as separate solids and a fillet wouldn't be possible.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2016 17:59:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/Analysis/Trimming-Solids-and-Part-Modeling-Question/m-p/378128#M4094</guid>
      <dc:creator>mwesselski</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-02-16T17:59:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Trimming Solids and Part Modeling Question</title>
      <link>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/Analysis/Trimming-Solids-and-Part-Modeling-Question/m-p/378129#M4095</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'd say more than acceptable - it's the default approach.&amp;nbsp; They're not really separate solids, just separate (solid) features.&amp;nbsp; As soon as you add each new one it just becomes part of the part (if that makes sense!).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm not familiar with NX, but in Creo it's generally considered good practice to build up your part using many, simple features, rather than trying to cram all the detail into a single feature.&amp;nbsp; Therefore building up your solid incrementally this way is absolutely fine.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2016 08:39:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/Analysis/Trimming-Solids-and-Part-Modeling-Question/m-p/378129#M4095</guid>
      <dc:creator>JonathanHodgson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-02-17T08:39:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Trimming Solids and Part Modeling Question</title>
      <link>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/Analysis/Trimming-Solids-and-Part-Modeling-Question/m-p/378130#M4096</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;From talking to other NX users (and my very limited experience), the first thing you'll need to understand about CREO is that a part model is one single part as represented in the physical world. Creo does not do the multiple "bodies" in a part. If you have 2 "things" in creo, you will have 2 part models (separate .prt files) and one assembly model (separate .asm file).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You'll have to get over multiple body part files, they don't exist in Creo. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2016 12:42:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/Analysis/Trimming-Solids-and-Part-Modeling-Question/m-p/378130#M4096</guid>
      <dc:creator>StephenW</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-02-17T12:42:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

