topic Re: Create a progress circle using Creo UI editor in Customization

Create a progress circle using Creo UI editor

RJ_11007702 — Mon, 29 Sep 2025 16:34:31 GMT

I see there is a Progress bar component in Creo UI editor.

1. Is it possible to have something like a progress circle in Creo UI editor?

2. Or a custom gif that we could display to accomplish showing an in-progress operation?

cc @GS_14113977

Re: Create a progress circle using Creo UI editor

MikePhillips — Mon, 29 Sep 2025 17:13:31 GMT

Looks like there is a progress bar component. I have never used it before. (The screen shot is from version 7)

Re: Create a progress circle using Creo UI editor

RJ_11007702 — Mon, 29 Sep 2025 17:17:50 GMT

Thanks @MikePhillips .

Apologies if I was not clear, what I meant was, I see the Progress bar component but is it possible to use a circle to show the progress instead of a 'bar' or anything custom for that matter.

Re: Create a progress circle using Creo UI editor

MikePhillips — Mon, 29 Sep 2025 17:35:12 GMT

Sorry. I did not read your post very well at all! That is my mistake. 🤣

I would think you could utilize a Drawing Area. You could then loop thru a serious of images that create the illusion of an animated circle progress. Or draw a progress image.

Re: Create a progress circle using Creo UI editor

RJ_11007702 — Wed, 01 Oct 2025 14:24:41 GMT

No worries @MikePhillips !

Thanks for the workaround. We will consider this to see if this fits into our requirement. Thanks again!

Re: Create a progress circle using Creo UI editor

anursingh — Wed, 22 Oct 2025 07:14:34 GMT

Hi @RJ_11007702,

I wanted to see if you got the help you needed.

If so, please mark the appropriate reply as the Accepted Solution. It will help other members who may have the same question.
Of course, if you have more to share on your issue, please pursue the conversation.

Thanks,
Anurag

Re: Create a progress circle using Creo UI editor

RJ_11007702 — Thu, 23 Oct 2025 12:28:18 GMT

Thank for the follow up @anursingh !

The solution suggested by @MikePhillips seems the only way ahead. Though in the interest of time (and keeping in mind the maintenance requirement of a custom solution), we have slightly modified our requirements .