<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Flexible components and outdated mass properties in 3D Part &amp; Assembly Design</title>
    <link>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/3D-Part-Assembly-Design/Flexible-components-and-outdated-mass-properties/m-p/947238#M134579</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Clear, and there is not even a hidden setting to avoid this?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2024 13:31:21 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Ralph_W</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-05-01T13:31:21Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Flexible components and outdated mass properties</title>
      <link>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/3D-Part-Assembly-Design/Flexible-components-and-outdated-mass-properties/m-p/947110#M134567</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We use the PRO_MP_MASS parameter for our weight calculation and as a value on our drawing.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;To ensure everybody is executing the mass calculation the setting mass_property_calculate is set to report_outdateness_only (or check_upon_save). A warning&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For normal assemblies these settings are ok.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But in assemblies where we use flexible component (e.g. a spring or a folded flexfoil) the mass properties of the assemblies keep outdated every time the assembly is opened.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Even a bottom up mass calculation of all parts and finally the assembly will not help. Because after closing and re-open the assembly,&amp;nbsp; the assembly shows "outdated mass properties".&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How to solve, or block this?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2024 15:35:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/3D-Part-Assembly-Design/Flexible-components-and-outdated-mass-properties/m-p/947110#M134567</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ralph_W</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-04-30T15:35:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Flexible components and outdated mass properties</title>
      <link>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/3D-Part-Assembly-Design/Flexible-components-and-outdated-mass-properties/m-p/947113#M134568</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm&amp;nbsp; not sure you can prevent this due to the flexible part being 'modified' when brought into the assembly.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;A hose assembly modeled as 12 inches as a standalone part, when in the assembly it is now 15 inches as it follows the flexible path, it has a new mass due to the longer length. Not sure how a sping 'stretches' as a flexible part (add coils or changes spacing) but the add coils would also change the mass.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2024 16:06:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/3D-Part-Assembly-Design/Flexible-components-and-outdated-mass-properties/m-p/947113#M134568</guid>
      <dc:creator>BenLoosli</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-04-30T16:06:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Flexible components and outdated mass properties</title>
      <link>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/3D-Part-Assembly-Design/Flexible-components-and-outdated-mass-properties/m-p/947115#M134569</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You may need to use User Defined Mass Properties for any part that you intend to flex.&amp;nbsp; Even stretching a spring by changing the spacing will change the mass calculation as the diameter of the spring is not collapsing as it would in real life.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2024 16:16:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/3D-Part-Assembly-Design/Flexible-components-and-outdated-mass-properties/m-p/947115#M134569</guid>
      <dc:creator>kdirth</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-04-30T16:16:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Flexible components and outdated mass properties</title>
      <link>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/3D-Part-Assembly-Design/Flexible-components-and-outdated-mass-properties/m-p/947217#M134575</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The strange thing is that I already brought the flexible component into the assembly and adjust the length or folding angle. I updated the mass calculation of the assembly (and this one is correct).&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But after closing and opening the assembly again (no changes made) the mass property of the assembly is outdated.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Somehow the mass is not stored in the assembly if flexible component is in.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2024 08:11:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/3D-Part-Assembly-Design/Flexible-components-and-outdated-mass-properties/m-p/947217#M134575</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ralph_W</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-05-01T08:11:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Flexible components and outdated mass properties</title>
      <link>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/3D-Part-Assembly-Design/Flexible-components-and-outdated-mass-properties/m-p/947228#M134577</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Using flexibility does not change the part file.&amp;nbsp; It still has the unflexed mass properties.&amp;nbsp; A flexed part in an assembly loads the original part file into memory then modifies it based on the flexibility settings, changing the mass properties calculation.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2024 12:14:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/3D-Part-Assembly-Design/Flexible-components-and-outdated-mass-properties/m-p/947228#M134577</guid>
      <dc:creator>kdirth</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-05-01T12:14:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Flexible components and outdated mass properties</title>
      <link>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/3D-Part-Assembly-Design/Flexible-components-and-outdated-mass-properties/m-p/947238#M134579</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Clear, and there is not even a hidden setting to avoid this?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2024 13:31:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/3D-Part-Assembly-Design/Flexible-components-and-outdated-mass-properties/m-p/947238#M134579</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ralph_W</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-05-01T13:31:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Flexible components and outdated mass properties</title>
      <link>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/3D-Part-Assembly-Design/Flexible-components-and-outdated-mass-properties/m-p/947425#M134582</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We have the same setting and have experienced the same issue without a solution. If you make an idea for maybe people will vote it up.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2024 11:33:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/3D-Part-Assembly-Design/Flexible-components-and-outdated-mass-properties/m-p/947425#M134582</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris3</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-05-02T11:33:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Flexible components and outdated mass properties</title>
      <link>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/3D-Part-Assembly-Design/Flexible-components-and-outdated-mass-properties/m-p/952148#M134931</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/133179"&gt;@kdirth&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;It still has the unflexed mass properties.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This is not true. The mass property parameter is not updated but if you run the mass property report (Analysis -&amp;gt; Mass properties) it is updated.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This is part of the reason that we don't rely on the mass properties parameter to get mass properties out.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2024 13:45:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/3D-Part-Assembly-Design/Flexible-components-and-outdated-mass-properties/m-p/952148#M134931</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris3</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-05-24T13:45:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

