<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Different constraint sets for different simplified reps in 3D Part &amp; Assembly Design</title>
    <link>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/3D-Part-Assembly-Design/Different-constraint-sets-for-different-simplified-reps/m-p/966627#M136030</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;i was avoiding using multiple components for the simplified reps because my structure will then show the incorrect # of components, but if thats the only solution so be it.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2024 17:50:35 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>TP_10470858</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-08-14T17:50:35Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Different constraint sets for different simplified reps</title>
      <link>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/3D-Part-Assembly-Design/Different-constraint-sets-for-different-simplified-reps/m-p/966621#M136028</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;is it possible to have different constraint sets for different simplified reps i have found a couple similar threads but they are all using it as a subassembly. such as this video.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UHPnkSguUQE" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UHPnkSguUQE&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2024 16:57:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/3D-Part-Assembly-Design/Different-constraint-sets-for-different-simplified-reps/m-p/966621#M136028</guid>
      <dc:creator>TP_10470858</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-08-14T16:57:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Different constraint sets for different simplified reps</title>
      <link>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/3D-Part-Assembly-Design/Different-constraint-sets-for-different-simplified-reps/m-p/966626#M136029</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The video is using flexibility to change constraint sets of a sub assembly when assembled.&amp;nbsp; Simplified reps cannot control constraint sets.&amp;nbsp; The best you could do with simplified reps is add the component twice, in different positions, and use simplified reps to pick which one to show.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2024 17:46:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/3D-Part-Assembly-Design/Different-constraint-sets-for-different-simplified-reps/m-p/966626#M136029</guid>
      <dc:creator>kdirth</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-08-14T17:46:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Different constraint sets for different simplified reps</title>
      <link>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/3D-Part-Assembly-Design/Different-constraint-sets-for-different-simplified-reps/m-p/966627#M136030</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;i was avoiding using multiple components for the simplified reps because my structure will then show the incorrect # of components, but if thats the only solution so be it.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2024 17:50:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/3D-Part-Assembly-Design/Different-constraint-sets-for-different-simplified-reps/m-p/966627#M136030</guid>
      <dc:creator>TP_10470858</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-08-14T17:50:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Different constraint sets for different simplified reps</title>
      <link>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/3D-Part-Assembly-Design/Different-constraint-sets-for-different-simplified-reps/m-p/966631#M136032</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Simplified reps filter what is displayed. If you need to control the location, # of, or inclusion of a component in an assembly simp reps are not the correct tool for that. You can explore Pro/program, Notebooks, Creo Options Modeler extension which have functionality to address your requirements.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I would avoid assembly family tables and only state this as someone is likely to suggest this to you as an option. It will be a painful option in all but trivial cases.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2024 18:15:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/3D-Part-Assembly-Design/Different-constraint-sets-for-different-simplified-reps/m-p/966631#M136032</guid>
      <dc:creator>tbraxton</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-08-14T18:15:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Different constraint sets for different simplified reps</title>
      <link>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/3D-Part-Assembly-Design/Different-constraint-sets-for-different-simplified-reps/m-p/966633#M136033</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Sometimes its better to state your end goal instead of what you think your solution may be. Simplified reps have been&amp;nbsp; used for many purposes but it's primary goal is large assembly management.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Based on your end goal, maybe there are much better solutions!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2024 18:18:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/3D-Part-Assembly-Design/Different-constraint-sets-for-different-simplified-reps/m-p/966633#M136033</guid>
      <dc:creator>StephenW</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-08-14T18:18:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Different constraint sets for different simplified reps</title>
      <link>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/3D-Part-Assembly-Design/Different-constraint-sets-for-different-simplified-reps/m-p/966634#M136034</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;No family tables lol&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2024 18:20:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/3D-Part-Assembly-Design/Different-constraint-sets-for-different-simplified-reps/m-p/966634#M136034</guid>
      <dc:creator>TP_10470858</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-08-14T18:20:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Different constraint sets for different simplified reps</title>
      <link>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/3D-Part-Assembly-Design/Different-constraint-sets-for-different-simplified-reps/m-p/966635#M136035</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;"painful option in all but trivial cases"...yaaa, that is probably an understatement!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2024 18:20:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/3D-Part-Assembly-Design/Different-constraint-sets-for-different-simplified-reps/m-p/966635#M136035</guid>
      <dc:creator>StephenW</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-08-14T18:20:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Different constraint sets for different simplified reps</title>
      <link>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/3D-Part-Assembly-Design/Different-constraint-sets-for-different-simplified-reps/m-p/966636#M136036</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Haha, familty tables is probably the reason you are trying to find a better solution!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2024 18:21:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/3D-Part-Assembly-Design/Different-constraint-sets-for-different-simplified-reps/m-p/966636#M136036</guid>
      <dc:creator>StephenW</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-08-14T18:21:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Different constraint sets for different simplified reps</title>
      <link>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/3D-Part-Assembly-Design/Different-constraint-sets-for-different-simplified-reps/m-p/966637#M136037</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;do we know if this is possible in creo 10?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2024 18:25:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/3D-Part-Assembly-Design/Different-constraint-sets-for-different-simplified-reps/m-p/966637#M136037</guid>
      <dc:creator>TP_10470858</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-08-14T18:25:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Different constraint sets for different simplified reps</title>
      <link>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/3D-Part-Assembly-Design/Different-constraint-sets-for-different-simplified-reps/m-p/966638#M136038</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;To control constaint sets with simplified reps? No, not possible.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It's very unlikely PTC will go that direction with simplified reps. It doesn't really fit the large assembly management purpose for the tool.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2024 18:27:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/3D-Part-Assembly-Design/Different-constraint-sets-for-different-simplified-reps/m-p/966638#M136038</guid>
      <dc:creator>StephenW</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-08-14T18:27:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

