<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Does Anyone have trouble with ProE WF.5 model integrity when imported to Mastercam? in 3D Part &amp; Assembly Design</title>
    <link>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/3D-Part-Assembly-Design/Does-Anyone-have-trouble-with-ProE-WF-5-model-integrity-when/m-p/89428#M33082</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I need some input on consistant model integrity issues when a ProE part is loaded into Mastercam.&amp;nbsp; I have found a lot of config settings to handle export settings but seem to have made things worst when guessing at what to set.&amp;nbsp; I generally go back and forth between file types .prt, .iges, step. as well as adjust file tolerance until something works.&amp;nbsp; Many times I have to remodel or adjust features of the model because the designers just don't understand the caveats that create issues for the manufacturing side.&amp;nbsp; 90% of the time model problems that need to be modified don't affect the design yet still require correction to avoid downstream corruption with in my CAM system.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This has been an issue throughout my 20 years at doing this, and I thought it time I reached out and acquired more knowledge if possible.&amp;nbsp; I am a focal point for fixing the models that will not import without problems and while I can usually visually see spots that are going to be troublesome sometimes it is not apparent and it takes up a great deal of time.&amp;nbsp; I appreciate any input with regard to saving .prt files and options on how the file is saved &amp;lt;I am machining against these so triangular mesh is not desired&amp;gt; exporting if formats for STEP AND IGES&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you in advance for input.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;d&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;This thread is inactive and closed by the PTC Community Management Team. If you would like to provide a reply and re-open this thread, please notify the moderator and reference the thread.  You may also use "Start a topic" button to ask a new question. Please be sure to include what version of the PTC product you are using so another community member knowledgeable about your version may be able to assist. &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2020 01:41:33 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>dparks-2</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-12-13T01:41:33Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Does Anyone have trouble with ProE WF.5 model integrity when imported to Mastercam?</title>
      <link>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/3D-Part-Assembly-Design/Does-Anyone-have-trouble-with-ProE-WF-5-model-integrity-when/m-p/89428#M33082</link>
      <description>I need some input on consistant model integrity issues when a ProE part is loaded into Mastercam.&amp;nbsp; I have found a lot of config settings to handle export settings but seem to have made things worst when guessing at what to set.&amp;nbsp; I generally go back and forth between file types .prt,</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2020 01:41:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/3D-Part-Assembly-Design/Does-Anyone-have-trouble-with-ProE-WF-5-model-integrity-when/m-p/89428#M33082</guid>
      <dc:creator>dparks-2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-12-13T01:41:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Does Anyone have trouble with ProE WF.5 model integrity when imported to Mastercam?</title>
      <link>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/3D-Part-Assembly-Design/Does-Anyone-have-trouble-with-ProE-WF-5-model-integrity-when/m-p/89429#M33083</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Damon, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; yes, feeling&amp;nbsp; your pain, as the years go by and the versions go up on both sides &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; it seems to be getting worst instead of better.&amp;nbsp; we have not found a good solution.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; ...but...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; SpaceClaim seems to be a decent go between. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; User beware....it will make some crazy assumptions&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2016 15:49:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/3D-Part-Assembly-Design/Does-Anyone-have-trouble-with-ProE-WF-5-model-integrity-when/m-p/89429#M33083</guid>
      <dc:creator>dguillette-2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-09-24T15:49:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

