<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: ShrinkWrap Faceted Solid fails in 3D Part &amp; Assembly Design</title>
    <link>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/3D-Part-Assembly-Design/ShrinkWrap-Faceted-Solid-fails/m-p/184974#M4003</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Part size seems to have a lot to do with it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Filling holes doesn't solve it?&amp;nbsp; Not that you would necessarily want to do that.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The Merged Solid option doesn't solve it?&amp;nbsp; You can output the solid as a STL with much more control.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You might look outside Creo to check the output if this process is important.&amp;nbsp; MeshMixer will solidify leaky STLs with little effort.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Anything facet modification based manipulation is buried on some optional PTC Creo extension (Manufacturing?). &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Features that generate facet mesh are hardly universal within Creo either, meaning the level of control is best only in an STL export.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Even that has some serious limitations error error modes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Shrinkwrap's reliability making faceted solids also seems to weaken as assembly complexity increases.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Since you seem to be bound by some hard rules, it is hard to speculate on a more reliable solutions.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2016 22:42:12 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>TomD.inPDX</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-11-22T22:42:12Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ShrinkWrap Faceted Solid fails</title>
      <link>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/3D-Part-Assembly-Design/ShrinkWrap-Faceted-Solid-fails/m-p/184973#M4002</link>
      <description>I am working with the ShrinkWrap feature to create light representations of large assemblies. Subsequently I need to create a STL file out of the ShrinkWrap (I am aware that it is possible to create the STL from the ShrinkWrap window, but we have an automated process).We are generating</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2018 00:11:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/3D-Part-Assembly-Design/ShrinkWrap-Faceted-Solid-fails/m-p/184973#M4002</guid>
      <dc:creator>mnico</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-05-03T00:11:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ShrinkWrap Faceted Solid fails</title>
      <link>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/3D-Part-Assembly-Design/ShrinkWrap-Faceted-Solid-fails/m-p/184974#M4003</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Part size seems to have a lot to do with it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Filling holes doesn't solve it?&amp;nbsp; Not that you would necessarily want to do that.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The Merged Solid option doesn't solve it?&amp;nbsp; You can output the solid as a STL with much more control.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You might look outside Creo to check the output if this process is important.&amp;nbsp; MeshMixer will solidify leaky STLs with little effort.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Anything facet modification based manipulation is buried on some optional PTC Creo extension (Manufacturing?). &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Features that generate facet mesh are hardly universal within Creo either, meaning the level of control is best only in an STL export.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Even that has some serious limitations error error modes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Shrinkwrap's reliability making faceted solids also seems to weaken as assembly complexity increases.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Since you seem to be bound by some hard rules, it is hard to speculate on a more reliable solutions.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2016 22:42:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/3D-Part-Assembly-Design/ShrinkWrap-Faceted-Solid-fails/m-p/184974#M4003</guid>
      <dc:creator>TomD.inPDX</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-11-22T22:42:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ShrinkWrap Faceted Solid fails</title>
      <link>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/3D-Part-Assembly-Design/ShrinkWrap-Faceted-Solid-fails/m-p/184975#M4004</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The problem was solved by reducing the quality level. Probably for high levels the triangulation is more complex.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2017 16:17:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/3D-Part-Assembly-Design/ShrinkWrap-Faceted-Solid-fails/m-p/184975#M4004</guid>
      <dc:creator>mnico</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-01-10T16:17:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

