<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: ModuleWorks Issue in 3D Part &amp; Assembly Design</title>
    <link>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/3D-Part-Assembly-Design/ModuleWorks-Issue/m-p/15785#M73126</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you can report it then I'd say do it. ModuleWorks is kind of new addition. PTC might be able to reconsider the introduction of it and allow to run it even with failed features in any of the family table's assembly.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2017 19:56:50 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>James62</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-01-06T19:56:50Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ModuleWorks Issue</title>
      <link>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/3D-Part-Assembly-Design/ModuleWorks-Issue/m-p/15784#M73125</link>
      <description>I have discovered a major issue with ModuleWorks where I have a manufacturing file that is a family table of parts. I programmed the first part then switched the part to the instance and some things blew up (which I expected to happen). There are 3 operations in the manufacturing</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2018 00:04:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/3D-Part-Assembly-Design/ModuleWorks-Issue/m-p/15784#M73125</guid>
      <dc:creator>SteveLucas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-05-03T00:04:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ModuleWorks Issue</title>
      <link>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/3D-Part-Assembly-Design/ModuleWorks-Issue/m-p/15785#M73126</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you can report it then I'd say do it. ModuleWorks is kind of new addition. PTC might be able to reconsider the introduction of it and allow to run it even with failed features in any of the family table's assembly.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2017 19:56:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/3D-Part-Assembly-Design/ModuleWorks-Issue/m-p/15785#M73126</guid>
      <dc:creator>James62</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-01-06T19:56:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

