<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: All of the windows for inclusion in the template must be from the same study directory (Error Message) in 3D Part &amp; Assembly Design</title>
    <link>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/3D-Part-Assembly-Design/All-of-the-windows-for-inclusion-in-the-template-must-be-from/m-p/231971#M7408</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Don,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What you experience is how it works.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The template can be considered a mapkey. A stored sequence of generic instructions that are applied. Edit an rwt file to see.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The template would have to work with some relative (from a first selected study) path to find the other studies which are unlikely to be consistent.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The absolute paths won't be consistent.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;lt;study id="1180" name="Analysis1" path=".\..\..\..\wind\" type="4"&amp;gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;lt;analysis id="1176" name="Analysis1"/&amp;gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;lt;loadModeInfo type="4" action="4"&amp;gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;lt;loadModeScale scale="1.000000" included="true"/&amp;gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;lt;/loadModeInfo&amp;gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Having the studies all in the same directory would be a special case I suppose.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, when you open your first study the template would have to know the name for the next it is looking for, unless the user is prompted to seek another.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and we lost the facility to append to already open results windows with those from another rwd a while back (wf1.0?.... I saw some discussion on this recently but can't remember where.).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2015 17:20:06 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>346gnu</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-06-17T17:20:06Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>All of the windows for inclusion in the template must be from the same study directory (Error Message)</title>
      <link>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/3D-Part-Assembly-Design/All-of-the-windows-for-inclusion-in-the-template-must-be-from/m-p/231970#M7407</link>
      <description>Good Day All,I have run into this message in the past and have not thought much of it till now.Running a simple assembly containing 3 parts in Creo Parametric Simulate. I have 4 results windows up on the screen for the same assembly obtained from a design study that ran 4 separate</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2020 14:44:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/3D-Part-Assembly-Design/All-of-the-windows-for-inclusion-in-the-template-must-be-from/m-p/231970#M7407</guid>
      <dc:creator>danderson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-12-12T14:44:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: All of the windows for inclusion in the template must be from the same study directory (Error Message)</title>
      <link>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/3D-Part-Assembly-Design/All-of-the-windows-for-inclusion-in-the-template-must-be-from/m-p/231971#M7408</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Don,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What you experience is how it works.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The template can be considered a mapkey. A stored sequence of generic instructions that are applied. Edit an rwt file to see.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The template would have to work with some relative (from a first selected study) path to find the other studies which are unlikely to be consistent.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The absolute paths won't be consistent.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;lt;study id="1180" name="Analysis1" path=".\..\..\..\wind\" type="4"&amp;gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;lt;analysis id="1176" name="Analysis1"/&amp;gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;lt;loadModeInfo type="4" action="4"&amp;gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;lt;loadModeScale scale="1.000000" included="true"/&amp;gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;lt;/loadModeInfo&amp;gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Having the studies all in the same directory would be a special case I suppose.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, when you open your first study the template would have to know the name for the next it is looking for, unless the user is prompted to seek another.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and we lost the facility to append to already open results windows with those from another rwd a while back (wf1.0?.... I saw some discussion on this recently but can't remember where.).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2015 17:20:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/3D-Part-Assembly-Design/All-of-the-windows-for-inclusion-in-the-template-must-be-from/m-p/231971#M7408</guid>
      <dc:creator>346gnu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-06-17T17:20:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: All of the windows for inclusion in the template must be from the same study directory (Error Message)</title>
      <link>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/3D-Part-Assembly-Design/All-of-the-windows-for-inclusion-in-the-template-must-be-from/m-p/231972#M7409</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Charles,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What would be nice is having a Design Study Revision scheme where the design study or Analysis name('s) do not change but allow you to run multiple part iterations for one assembly and allow you to use a template to report for each design study run (modal, load direction 1, load direction 2, etc.)&lt;BR /&gt;If you don't change the analysis names from run to run you should be able to use a template to develop the report from?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Don&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2015 14:00:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/3D-Part-Assembly-Design/All-of-the-windows-for-inclusion-in-the-template-must-be-from/m-p/231972#M7409</guid>
      <dc:creator>danderson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-06-22T14:00:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

