<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Cosmetic Threads should be controlled by configurable table in 3D Part &amp; Assembly Design</title>
    <link>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/3D-Part-Assembly-Design/Cosmetic-Threads-should-be-controlled-by-configurable-table/m-p/462377#M88896</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;In Creo 2.0 you can use the Standard Thread option you just don't get the Note with it. I don't want the Simple Thread option removed. You are currently unable to programmatically change the size of the thread/hole when using the Standard option.&amp;nbsp; I think it would be best if this Idea was Add NOTE when using the Standard Thread option for cosmetic threads.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2016 20:06:24 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>WayneSchrock</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-12-14T20:06:24Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Cosmetic Threads should be controlled by configurable table</title>
      <link>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/3D-Part-Assembly-Design/Cosmetic-Threads-should-be-controlled-by-configurable-table/m-p/462376#M88895</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Currently, the &lt;EM&gt;Cosmetic Threads&lt;/EM&gt; tool is not controlled by a configurable table similar to the &lt;EM&gt;Hole &lt;/EM&gt;tool. The tool requires parameters to be entered in place of using a configurable table. This would be managable except the parametes are &lt;EM&gt;Real Number&lt;/EM&gt; for the &lt;EM&gt;Major Diameter&lt;/EM&gt;. So, it not possible to drive the correct note by editing the parameters. Example Callout might be &lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;1/2-13UNC 2A x 200.0&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;. Instead, I get &lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;10.720 - 0.512 UNC - 2B EXTERNAL&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;. (The CLASS defaults to 2B and should default to 2A for external thread)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG class="jive-image" src="https://community.ptc.com/legacyfs/online/50291_ScreenHunter_78+May.+14+08.30.jpg" border="0" alt="ScreenHunter_78 May. 14 08.30.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Cosmetic Threads tool withough Note preview and no way to drive correct callout.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG class="jive-image" src="https://community.ptc.com/legacyfs/online/50289_ScreenHunter_76+May.+14+08.19.jpg" border="0" alt="ScreenHunter_76 May. 14 08.19.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Hole tool example with Note preview.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG class="jive-image" src="https://community.ptc.com/legacyfs/online/50290_ScreenHunter_77+May.+14+08.19.jpg" border="0" alt="ScreenHunter_77 May. 14 08.19.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;This thread is inactive and closed by the PTC Community Management Team. If you would like to provide a reply and re-open this thread, please notify the moderator and reference the thread.  You may also use "Start a topic" button to ask a new question. Please be sure to include what version of the PTC product you are using so another community member knowledgeable about your version may be able to assist. &lt;/STRONG&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2020 11:01:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/3D-Part-Assembly-Design/Cosmetic-Threads-should-be-controlled-by-configurable-table/m-p/462376#M88895</guid>
      <dc:creator>ptc-2513036</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-12-13T11:01:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cosmetic Threads should be controlled by configurable table</title>
      <link>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/3D-Part-Assembly-Design/Cosmetic-Threads-should-be-controlled-by-configurable-table/m-p/462377#M88896</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;In Creo 2.0 you can use the Standard Thread option you just don't get the Note with it. I don't want the Simple Thread option removed. You are currently unable to programmatically change the size of the thread/hole when using the Standard option.&amp;nbsp; I think it would be best if this Idea was Add NOTE when using the Standard Thread option for cosmetic threads.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2016 20:06:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/t5/3D-Part-Assembly-Design/Cosmetic-Threads-should-be-controlled-by-configurable-table/m-p/462377#M88896</guid>
      <dc:creator>WayneSchrock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-12-14T20:06:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

