cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Community Tip - Did you get called away in the middle of writing a post? Don't worry you can find your unfinished post later in the Drafts section of your profile page. X

Castings

dbowles
4-Participant

Castings

WF 3.0
Casting Inheritance to Machined
Master Model
Family Table Instances

I have seen a few ways to do Castings to the Machined part as mentioned
above.
Would like to bounce this off the community to see others opinions.
Pro/Cons Feature count advantages etc.

Douglas K. Bowles
Advanced Systems Harn/Des
520-746-2019 Office
520-490-9395 Cell
-


PRIVACY ACT NOTICE: This communication may contain privileged or other
Official information. If you are not the intended recipient or believe
that you have received this communication in error, please reply to the
sender indicating that fact and delete the copy you received. It is a
violation of Federal Law to print, copy, retransmit, disseminate, or
otherwise use this information without prior authorization.
This thread is inactive and closed by the PTC Community Management Team. If you would like to provide a reply and re-open this thread, please notify the moderator and reference the thread. You may also use "Start a topic" button to ask a new question. Please be sure to include what version of the PTC product you are using so another community member knowledgeable about your version may be able to assist.
4 REPLIES 4

IMHO the Published and Copied geometry is the cleanest and easiest to use.
We used master models years ago and that process seems to have been
improved through Publish and Copy. Family tables enable you to keep
everything in one file w/o external references, but if the models get
complicated they can become unwieldy.

HIH
Have a good weekend,

Bob Frindt
Sr. Designer
Parker Hannifin Corporation
Parker Aerospace
Gas Turbine Fuel Systems Division
9200 Tyler Boulevard
Mentor, OH 44060 USA
direct (440) 954-8159
cell: (216) 990-8711
fax: (440) 954-8111
-
www.parker.com



Douglas K Bowles <->
03/19/2010 03:15 PM
Please respond to
Douglas K Bowles <->


To
-
cc

Subject
[proecad] - Castings






WF 3.0
Casting Inheritance to Machined
Master Model
Family Table Instances

I have seen a few ways to do Castings to the Machined part as mentioned
above.
Would like to bounce this off the community to see others opinions.
Pro/Cons Feature count advantages etc.

Douglas K. Bowles
Advanced Systems Harn/Des
520-746-2019 Office
520-490-9395 Cell
-


PRIVACY ACT NOTICE: This communication may contain privileged or other
Official information. If you are not the intended recipient or believe
that you have received this communication in error, please reply to the
sender indicating that fact and delete the copy you received. It is a
violation of Federal Law to print, copy, retransmit, disseminate, or
otherwise use this information without prior authorization.
Site Links: View post online View mailing list online Send new post
via email Manage your subscription Use of this email content is
governed by the terms of service at:

I'm with Bob. The Published Geom., Copy Geom. works well for us too and
once you've worked out the color of surfaces, it's great for indicating
machining, etc.



Richard A. Black

Lead Engineer

Eaton Corporation

440 Murray Hill Road

Southern Pines

NC 28387 USA


Hi Douglas,


I'm partial to the inheritance technique. Please see attached.


Joshua Houser| Pelco by Schneider Electric |Buildings & Business| United States| MCAD Tools Administrator
Phone: +559-292-1981 ext. 3490| Toll Free: +800-289-9100 ext. 3490&nbs

I agree with one caution: we make sure to use an EXTERNAL COPY GEOM,
that way, if we just open the machining with nothing else in session, we
ALSO bring the casting into session too. Essentially; turn off the
little "assembly ref" box in the copy geom... Note that we do NOT have
any PDM software, and just use a "manual" system.

We also TRY to enforce that our users keep all core, casting and
machining parts referenced to the "default" placement constraint to make
life easier for everyone.

As for the colors, if your core has colors defined to indicate "stuff"
(for instance, high and low pressure passages) and if you "paint" the
outside surface of your machining before making any cuts, USING
published geometry, the core colors will come back if you FORCE a
regeneration. We have a mapkey shown below to do this. I'm assuming
you cut the core out of your casting, and inherit the casting into the
machining. We typically will bring in the cores and USE those surfaces
to generate some of the outside surfaces of our casting. We typically
work with hydraulics, so it's high and low pressure passages that need a
constant thickness around them to work structurally.

!===========================================================
! FEV : FORCED REGENERATION
!===========================================================
mapkey fr @MAPKEY_NAMEruns model player to regenerate all;\
mapkey(continued) @MAPKEY_LABELforced regeneration;~ Command
`ProCmdInfoRegen` ;\
mapkey(continued) ~ Activate `regen_player_spinbox` `RegenRoll`1 ;\
mapkey(continued) ~ Activate `regen_player_spinbox` `Beginning`;\
mapkey(continued) ~ Activate `regen_player_spinbox` `End`;\
mapkey(continued) ~ Activate `regen_player_spinbox` `Close`;~ Command
`ProCmdViewRefit`;
mapkey(continued) #REGENERATE;

Thanks...

Paul Korenkiewicz
FEV, Inc.
4554 Glenmeade
Auburn Hills, MI., 48326

Top Tags