Start a topic
With the exception of Windchill, The PTC Community is on read-only status until April 6 in preparation for moving our community to a new platform. Learn more here
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

The PTC Community is on temporary read only status in preparation for moving our community to a new platform. Learn more here

Translate the entire conversation x

Boolean operation: source model positioning

RW_979959
2-Explorer

Boolean operation: source model positioning

I am using Creo Parametric Release 11.0 and Datecode11.0.6.0

I have a part 1 (single body .prt) in which I cut the volume of a part 2 (single body .prt) through a boolean operation.
After having modified the part 2, I updated the part 1: the part 2 positionning into part 1 was modified, the part 2 is turned upside-down into part 1.
How to (re)define the positionning of part 2 relatively to part 1?
ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions
tbraxton
22-Sapphire II
(To:RW_979959)

 As an observation I would use a skeleton model or other top-down design tool to control this design intent between the parts and not component operations if possible. Without access to your design data and full understanding of design intent it is hard to recommend a good practice.

 

It looks like Creo is flipping the surface normal reference on an assembly constraint. This could be due to the fact that the part is not fully constrained in the assembly locating these parts. If it is not fully constrained, try fixing that as a first step.

 

Based on the screenshots, you are working in assembly mode and using the merge cut out Boolean component operation. You can control the placement using the options shown in yellow below.

 

Part relative position controlPart relative position control

========================================
Involute Development, LLC
Consulting Engineers
Specialists in Creo Parametric

View solution in original post

4 REPLIES 4
tbraxton
22-Sapphire II
(To:RW_979959)

You need to provide more detail on how you are applying the Boolean operation, are you doing this in part mode or assembly mode? How are the parts constrained relative to each other? Is the Boolean operation done using multibody feature or through the use of the component operations in assembly mode?

 

If you post a screenshot of the models in question along with the model tree expanded to show the features that would be helpful or better yet post the models.

========================================
Involute Development, LLC
Consulting Engineers
Specialists in Creo Parametric

Hello tbraxton,

 

This boolean operation is done within part mode.

I see no constraint (or no way to access the constraints) to position the subsecting model relatively to the subsected model.

Enclosed are some screenshots, tell me is sufficient for you to understand the issue.

 

Bets regards,

Léon 

tbraxton
22-Sapphire II
(To:RW_979959)

 As an observation I would use a skeleton model or other top-down design tool to control this design intent between the parts and not component operations if possible. Without access to your design data and full understanding of design intent it is hard to recommend a good practice.

 

It looks like Creo is flipping the surface normal reference on an assembly constraint. This could be due to the fact that the part is not fully constrained in the assembly locating these parts. If it is not fully constrained, try fixing that as a first step.

 

Based on the screenshots, you are working in assembly mode and using the merge cut out Boolean component operation. You can control the placement using the options shown in yellow below.

 

Part relative position controlPart relative position control

========================================
Involute Development, LLC
Consulting Engineers
Specialists in Creo Parametric

Hello tbraxton,

 

In the light of your screenshot, I understand the subsected part must be opened into the context of an assembly which also contains the subsecting part ("top-down design tool").

I did, that works.

My knowledge of CREO must be deepened.

Thank you for your kind support,

 

Best regards,

Léon

Announcements


NEW Creo+ Topics: Real-time Collaboration

Top Tags