cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Community Tip - If community subscription notifications are filling up your inbox you can set up a daily digest and get all your notifications in a single email. X

Sheetmetal Views Summary

wfalco
15-Moonstone

Sheetmetal Views Summary


Thanks Paul. I am going to toy with this myself.


This thread is inactive and closed by the PTC Community Management Team. If you would like to provide a reply and re-open this thread, please notify the moderator and reference the thread. You may also use "Start a topic" button to ask a new question. Please be sure to include what version of the PTC product you are using so another community member knowledgeable about your version may be able to assist.
6 REPLIES 6
homerosaldana
5-Regular Member
(To:wfalco)

Sorry to chime in so late but has anyone tried using flexible components instead of a family table? We had a customer who didn’t like family tables, so we had to come up with a method of showing a cable flat in a drawing and formed in the model so we did the following: (since our customer didn’t have RSD, we couldn’t use that either)

1 Add the flat feature to your flexibility matrix.

2 Create a snapshot in the model of your flat state.

3 Suppress the flat feature from your model.

4 In the drawing view call up the snapshot flat state which works like a simplified rep.

We didn’t have any sheet metal flat patterns to do but I think it would work the same way. I’ve always used family tables but I thought I’d throw this out since it was a bit different. Maybe some of you smarter folks can shed some light on whether it’s better or worse than family tables. If you need me to go into more details just let me know. By the way I was using WF4.

$.02
-hsaldana
Ascendant Engineering Solutions
512-279-0822




wfalco
15-Moonstone
(To:wfalco)


I like the idea of using flexible components. However....there were
issues with the BOM when using flexible components. I think the right
quantities did not show? I am on 4.0 now. Has this been fixed?

TimMcLellan
6-Contributor
(To:wfalco)

The flexible component issue with BOM's is fixed if WF5 (it may have actually been WF4). I am currently using WF5. I have not used this technique (feature suppress) on sheet metal parts but I have used it on other types of flexible components with success.

Tim McLellan
Mobius Innovation and Development, Inc.

The issue was that the BOM balloons did not always display on the flexible
parts. I've used flexible components a handful of times since upgrading
to 4.0 and it seems to be working now.

Bob Frindt
Sr. Designer
Parker Hannifin Corporation
Parker Aerospace
Gas Turbine Fuel Systems Division
8940 Tyler Boulevard
Mentor, OH 44060 USA
direct (440) 266-2359
cell: (216) 990-8711
fax: (440) 266-2311
-
www.parker.com



wayne falco <->
09/17/2010 08:55 AM
Please respond to
wayne falco <->


To
-
cc
-, PTC/USER Pro-User Discussion
<->
Subject
[proecad] - RE: Sheetmetal Views Summary






I like the idea of using flexible components. However....there were issues
with the BOM when using flexible components. I think the right quantities
did not show? I am on 4.0 now. Has this been fixed?


homerosaldana
5-Regular Member
(To:wfalco)

The only issue I've seen with flexible components and boms is that the balloon callout attaches itself to the first occurrence of the component and you couldn't split a qty balloon.

WF4 M140
wfalco
15-Moonstone
(To:wfalco)


Thanks to everyone who responded to my question. Looks like it may work
for me. Will try. The qty balloon split is still an issue on 5?

Top Tags